<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 106 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24148</link>
    <description>Employer contributions to an approved gratuity fund are deductible under the Income-tax Act when read harmoniously with the statutory gratuity regime. The text states that section 36(1)(v) allows sums paid to an approved gratuity fund, and that gratuity liability, when scientifically or actuarially ascertained, is a proper business charge. It further notes that actual payment towards that liability is allowable in the year of payment, and that rule 103 cannot be read so restrictively as to deny deduction for excess contribution made to meet an existing statutory obligation. On that basis, the disallowance is described as unsustainable and the excess contribution as allowable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:35:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 106 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24148</link>
      <description>Employer contributions to an approved gratuity fund are deductible under the Income-tax Act when read harmoniously with the statutory gratuity regime. The text states that section 36(1)(v) allows sums paid to an approved gratuity fund, and that gratuity liability, when scientifically or actuarially ascertained, is a proper business charge. It further notes that actual payment towards that liability is allowable in the year of payment, and that rule 103 cannot be read so restrictively as to deny deduction for excess contribution made to meet an existing statutory obligation. On that basis, the disallowance is described as unsustainable and the excess contribution as allowable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>