<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1082 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402283</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, emphasizing that penalties are unjustifiable when the underlying assessment is legally disputed and debatable. The HC dismissed the appeals, affirming that no substantial question of law arose, thereby supporting the ITAT&#039;s judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1082 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402283</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, emphasizing that penalties are unjustifiable when the underlying assessment is legally disputed and debatable. The HC dismissed the appeals, affirming that no substantial question of law arose, thereby supporting the ITAT&#039;s judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>