<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1081 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402282</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against the Assessee in both issues, emphasizing that expenses incurred in connection with the transfer are deductible while computing capital gains. The court held that direct payment of sale proceeds to discharge mortgages does not entitle the Assessee to claim no capital gains due to non-receipt of consideration. The court relied on relevant legal provisions and precedents, dismissing the Assessee&#039;s claims and ruling in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2020 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1081 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402282</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against the Assessee in both issues, emphasizing that expenses incurred in connection with the transfer are deductible while computing capital gains. The court held that direct payment of sale proceeds to discharge mortgages does not entitle the Assessee to claim no capital gains due to non-receipt of consideration. The court relied on relevant legal provisions and precedents, dismissing the Assessee&#039;s claims and ruling in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>