<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1077 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402278</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the Criminal Original Petitions, quashing the proceedings against the petitioner/A3 alone, based on the petitioner&#039;s resignation and non-involvement in the company&#039;s affairs at the time of the offense, absolving her from vicarious liability under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2020 09:46:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1077 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402278</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the Criminal Original Petitions, quashing the proceedings against the petitioner/A3 alone, based on the petitioner&#039;s resignation and non-involvement in the company&#039;s affairs at the time of the offense, absolving her from vicarious liability under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>