<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1064 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402265</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessees, holding that the additions made by the AO under sections 68 and 69C were not sustainable due to the absence of incriminating material and the denial of the right to cross-examine third parties. The Tribunal directed that the income from cloth trading be treated as business income and not as unexplained cash credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2020 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1064 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402265</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessees, holding that the additions made by the AO under sections 68 and 69C were not sustainable due to the absence of incriminating material and the denial of the right to cross-examine third parties. The Tribunal directed that the income from cloth trading be treated as business income and not as unexplained cash credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>