<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1057 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402258</link>
    <description>The appeal of the assessee was allowed, subject to verification, with the addition of Rs. 5,00,000 sent for verification due to the lack of proof of deposit in the assessee&#039;s bank account. The addition of Rs. 2.20 crores was dependent on the verification outcome of the Rs. 5,00,000 addition. Grounds 3 to 5 were not separately adjudicated as they became academic. The tribunal directed verification regarding the additions, and the appeal outcome favored the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2020 09:45:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1057 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402258</link>
      <description>The appeal of the assessee was allowed, subject to verification, with the addition of Rs. 5,00,000 sent for verification due to the lack of proof of deposit in the assessee&#039;s bank account. The addition of Rs. 2.20 crores was dependent on the verification outcome of the Rs. 5,00,000 addition. Grounds 3 to 5 were not separately adjudicated as they became academic. The tribunal directed verification regarding the additions, and the appeal outcome favored the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>