https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402254 The Tribunal dismissed the application under Section 9 of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as the applicant failed to provide essential documents to substantiate the claim of unpaid debt from the respondent. The absence of crucial evidence, including purchase orders and receipts, raised doubts about the credibility of the claim. Moreover, the application was deemed time-barred due to the last invoice being dated beyond three years from the filing date. The lack of supporting documentation for the claimed interest and irrelevant bank statements led to the conclusion that the application was not maintainable. Company Petition (IB) No. 702 of 2019 was dismissed without costs. en-us Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Dec 2020 09:44:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402254 The Tribunal dismissed the application under Section 9 of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as the applicant failed to provide essential documents to substantiate the claim of unpaid debt from the respondent. The absence of crucial evidence, including purchase orders and receipts, raised doubts about the credibility of the claim. Moreover, the application was deemed time-barred due to the last invoice being dated beyond three years from the filing date. The lack of supporting documentation for the claimed interest and irrelevant bank statements led to the conclusion that the application was not maintainable. Company Petition (IB) No. 702 of 2019 was dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402254