https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292512 The court allowed the criminal revision petition, setting aside the judgments of the lower courts. It found that the petitioner successfully raised a defense creating doubt about the debt's existence. The failure to verify the cheque's authenticity through expert opinion and the omission to consider findings from a parallel case were deemed significant errors, leading to the conclusion that the lower courts' findings were based on an incorrect interpretation of the law. en-us Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 27 Dec 2020 01:08:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292512 The court allowed the criminal revision petition, setting aside the judgments of the lower courts. It found that the petitioner successfully raised a defense creating doubt about the debt's existence. The failure to verify the cheque's authenticity through expert opinion and the omission to consider findings from a parallel case were deemed significant errors, leading to the conclusion that the lower courts' findings were based on an incorrect interpretation of the law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292512