<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1912 (9) TMI 2 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292505</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the District Judge&#039;s decree, dismissing the appeal with costs to the plaintiffs. It held the disputed property as ancestral, debts were for immoral purposes, and the fourth plaintiff was entitled to his share in the ancestral property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 1912 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2020 12:51:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1912 (9) TMI 2 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292505</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the District Judge&#039;s decree, dismissing the appeal with costs to the plaintiffs. It held the disputed property as ancestral, debts were for immoral purposes, and the fourth plaintiff was entitled to his share in the ancestral property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 1912 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>