<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1025 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402226</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee for the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16 for statistical purposes. It directed the ITO-TDS to verify the assessee&#039;s claim regarding the payees having paid taxes on the commission income and to reassess the liability under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) accordingly. The procedural delay in pronouncing the order was justified due to the exceptional circumstances of the COVID-19 lockdown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2020 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1025 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402226</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee for the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16 for statistical purposes. It directed the ITO-TDS to verify the assessee&#039;s claim regarding the payees having paid taxes on the commission income and to reassess the liability under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) accordingly. The procedural delay in pronouncing the order was justified due to the exceptional circumstances of the COVID-19 lockdown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>