<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1020 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402221</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to wilful defaulter proceedings was maintainable where the company was under corporate insolvency resolution and the impugned notices and orders were directed personally against the petitioners. Clause 3(b) of the RBI Master Circular on wilful defaulters was construed strictly and was held applicable to the borrower and promoters or whole-time directors; it could not be used to proceed against independent directors or corporate guarantors who were not shown to fall within that class. The proceedings were also vitiated because the forensic report was not supplied, the Identification Committee order was not served, and the Review Committee failed to apply independent mind, constituting breach of natural justice and the prescribed procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2020 11:08:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1020 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402221</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to wilful defaulter proceedings was maintainable where the company was under corporate insolvency resolution and the impugned notices and orders were directed personally against the petitioners. Clause 3(b) of the RBI Master Circular on wilful defaulters was construed strictly and was held applicable to the borrower and promoters or whole-time directors; it could not be used to proceed against independent directors or corporate guarantors who were not shown to fall within that class. The proceedings were also vitiated because the forensic report was not supplied, the Identification Committee order was not served, and the Review Committee failed to apply independent mind, constituting breach of natural justice and the prescribed procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>