https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402220 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order, and remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority for re-adjudication within 150 days. The appellants were directed to file an appropriate application within thirty days. The Tribunal emphasized that the ED's failure to notify the appellants constituted a violation of the principle of natural justice. It held that the decision regarding ownership and cultivation rights should be made by a competent civil court and not assumed by the ED. The attachments will continue until the completion of the proceedings before the Adjudicating Authority, maintaining the status quo concerning the attached properties. en-us Thu, 24 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Dec 2020 11:07:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402220 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order, and remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority for re-adjudication within 150 days. The appellants were directed to file an appropriate application within thirty days. The Tribunal emphasized that the ED's failure to notify the appellants constituted a violation of the principle of natural justice. It held that the decision regarding ownership and cultivation rights should be made by a competent civil court and not assumed by the ED. The attachments will continue until the completion of the proceedings before the Adjudicating Authority, maintaining the status quo concerning the attached properties. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 24 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402220