<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1012 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402213</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, determining that they did not provide &quot;renting of immovable property&quot; services to film distributors and were not liable for service tax on amounts received from the Snack Bar. The demand for service tax was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2020 10:47:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1012 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402213</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, determining that they did not provide &quot;renting of immovable property&quot; services to film distributors and were not liable for service tax on amounts received from the Snack Bar. The demand for service tax was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>