<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1010 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402211</link>
    <description>The Court directed respondent authorities to decide on the petitioner&#039;s refund claim for the 4th quarter of the assessment year 2013 in accordance with the law and regulations, emphasizing an expeditious resolution. The writ petition was disposed of with these observations, following the decision in Mafatlal Industries Ltd. vs. Union of India (1997) 5 SCC 536.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2020 10:44:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1010 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402211</link>
      <description>The Court directed respondent authorities to decide on the petitioner&#039;s refund claim for the 4th quarter of the assessment year 2013 in accordance with the law and regulations, emphasizing an expeditious resolution. The writ petition was disposed of with these observations, following the decision in Mafatlal Industries Ltd. vs. Union of India (1997) 5 SCC 536.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>