https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402208 Statutory presumption arising from an admitted cheque signature, proved dishonour and service of notice was not rebutted by an unsubstantiated defence of a different loan transaction, repayment and cheque misuse. The defence evidence and supporting documents lacked credibility, while the appellate reasoning relied predominantly on one witness without adequately evaluating the record. The acquittal for cheque dishonour was therefore treated as erroneous, and the complainant's appeal succeeded. en-us Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Dec 2020 10:43:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402208 Statutory presumption arising from an admitted cheque signature, proved dishonour and service of notice was not rebutted by an unsubstantiated defence of a different loan transaction, repayment and cheque misuse. The defence evidence and supporting documents lacked credibility, while the appellate reasoning relied predominantly on one witness without adequately evaluating the record. The acquittal for cheque dishonour was therefore treated as erroneous, and the complainant's appeal succeeded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402208