<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1929 (3) TMI 5 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292501</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras held that the legacy received by the assessee under her father&#039;s will, acquired through a decree, is not exempt from Income Tax as agricultural income. The daughter was taxed on the amount received as arrears of maintenance, not as agricultural income. The assessee was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 250 for the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2020 10:34:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1929 (3) TMI 5 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292501</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras held that the legacy received by the assessee under her father&#039;s will, acquired through a decree, is not exempt from Income Tax as agricultural income. The daughter was taxed on the amount received as arrears of maintenance, not as agricultural income. The assessee was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 250 for the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>