<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1944 (2) TMI 26 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292484</link>
    <description>An annuity charged on a zamindari yielding both agricultural and non-agricultural income was not wholly agricultural income merely because it was payable out of the estate. The Patna HC held that, under the Bihar Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1938, deduction is available only to the extent the annuity is attributable to agricultural income, because the Act is a machinery provision and does not deem the entire annuity to be the recipient&#039;s agricultural income. As the governing instrument did not direct payment from one source alone, the annuity had to be apportioned in the same ratio as agricultural income formed part of the total estate income. The claim therefore succeeded only for the agricultural share.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 1944 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2020 18:31:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1944 (2) TMI 26 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292484</link>
      <description>An annuity charged on a zamindari yielding both agricultural and non-agricultural income was not wholly agricultural income merely because it was payable out of the estate. The Patna HC held that, under the Bihar Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1938, deduction is available only to the extent the annuity is attributable to agricultural income, because the Act is a machinery provision and does not deem the entire annuity to be the recipient&#039;s agricultural income. As the governing instrument did not direct payment from one source alone, the annuity had to be apportioned in the same ratio as agricultural income formed part of the total estate income. The claim therefore succeeded only for the agricultural share.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 1944 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>