<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 988 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402189</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by directing the AO to retain the addition at 9.25% of Rs. 2.44 crores (Rs. 22,57,000) and delete the balance addition of Rs. 2,21,43,000. The Tribunal rejected the claim of double addition and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reject the reduction in closing stock. The assessee&#039;s argument regarding lack of opportunity before the CIT(A) was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2020 17:20:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 988 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402189</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by directing the AO to retain the addition at 9.25% of Rs. 2.44 crores (Rs. 22,57,000) and delete the balance addition of Rs. 2,21,43,000. The Tribunal rejected the claim of double addition and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reject the reduction in closing stock. The assessee&#039;s argument regarding lack of opportunity before the CIT(A) was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>