<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Hinges on Unresolved Dispute Over Substandard Material and Adhesion Issues in Laminates.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56035</link>
    <description>Initiation of CIRP - Whether the ‘Dispute’ pertaining to the invoice was settled between the parties? - The material on record, specifically the email dated 08.02.2019 evidences that the ‘Dispute’ is not ‘transaction centric’ but is an ongoing ‘Dispute’. Additionally, there is no documentary evidence to substantiate the contention of the Learned Counsel for the Appellant that November 2017 ‘Dispute’ was settled. The correspondence between the parties establishes that the ‘Dispute’ is with respect to substandard material supplied for both the consignments and explicitly refers to ‘problem of adhesion’ which led to laminates becoming unusable. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2020 15:58:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2020 15:58:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Hinges on Unresolved Dispute Over Substandard Material and Adhesion Issues in Laminates.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56035</link>
      <description>Initiation of CIRP - Whether the ‘Dispute’ pertaining to the invoice was settled between the parties? - The material on record, specifically the email dated 08.02.2019 evidences that the ‘Dispute’ is not ‘transaction centric’ but is an ongoing ‘Dispute’. Additionally, there is no documentary evidence to substantiate the contention of the Learned Counsel for the Appellant that November 2017 ‘Dispute’ was settled. The correspondence between the parties establishes that the ‘Dispute’ is with respect to substandard material supplied for both the consignments and explicitly refers to ‘problem of adhesion’ which led to laminates becoming unusable. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2020 15:58:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>