https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292479 The defendants appealed against a suit for rendition of accounts by the plaintiff, alleging agency as part of a joint Hindu family. The lower court decreed the suit, appointing a commissioner to assess the defendants' liability. The defendants claimed agency termination and disputed liability for rent collections. The court found defendant 1 as the principal agent, passing a preliminary decree for account rendition. Despite the plaintiff withholding documents, the court established the defendants' liability. The limitation plea was rejected, affirming agency existence within the limitation period. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the lower court's decision and awarding costs to the plaintiff. en-us Tue, 06 Feb 1934 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Dec 2020 13:09:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292479 The defendants appealed against a suit for rendition of accounts by the plaintiff, alleging agency as part of a joint Hindu family. The lower court decreed the suit, appointing a commissioner to assess the defendants' liability. The defendants claimed agency termination and disputed liability for rent collections. The court found defendant 1 as the principal agent, passing a preliminary decree for account rendition. Despite the plaintiff withholding documents, the court established the defendants' liability. The limitation plea was rejected, affirming agency existence within the limitation period. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the lower court's decision and awarding costs to the plaintiff. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Feb 1934 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292479