<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 949 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402150</link>
    <description>After sanction of an amalgamation scheme, a transferee company that receives sugar stock already covered by a valid entry tax exemption cannot be denied the same benefit on the ground that the transfer amounts to a fresh purchase. The existing Form K and exemption attached to the stock remained effective, and the transferee stepped into the transferor&#039;s position for the relevant tax benefit. Requiring a separate certificate from the transferor, which had ceased to exist after amalgamation, was unjustified. The refusal to issue Form D was therefore held unsustainable, and the claimed exemption benefit was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 14:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 949 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402150</link>
      <description>After sanction of an amalgamation scheme, a transferee company that receives sugar stock already covered by a valid entry tax exemption cannot be denied the same benefit on the ground that the transfer amounts to a fresh purchase. The existing Form K and exemption attached to the stock remained effective, and the transferee stepped into the transferor&#039;s position for the relevant tax benefit. Requiring a separate certificate from the transferor, which had ceased to exist after amalgamation, was unjustified. The refusal to issue Form D was therefore held unsustainable, and the claimed exemption benefit was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>