https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292454 The tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A)-XXII, New Delhi for non-prosecution. Despite notice sent and a prior adjournment, no one appeared on behalf of the assessee during the hearing, indicating a lack of interest. Citing legal principles and precedents, including the maxim "VIGILANTIBUS ET NON DORMIENTIBUS JURA SUB VENIUNT," the tribunal held that active pursuit is essential in legal proceedings. The appeal was treated as unadmitted, and the final order, pronounced on 10.12.2015, resulted in the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Dec 2020 09:34:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292454 The tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A)-XXII, New Delhi for non-prosecution. Despite notice sent and a prior adjournment, no one appeared on behalf of the assessee during the hearing, indicating a lack of interest. Citing legal principles and precedents, including the maxim "VIGILANTIBUS ET NON DORMIENTIBUS JURA SUB VENIUNT," the tribunal held that active pursuit is essential in legal proceedings. The appeal was treated as unadmitted, and the final order, pronounced on 10.12.2015, resulted in the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292454