<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1371 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292465</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the court found no fault in the Tribunal&#039;s decisions regarding the three questions of law raised by the revenue. The court noted that similar issues had been previously rejected, leading to the dismissal of the questions raised in the current appeal. The Tribunal&#039;s directions to the Assessing Officer were upheld, and the court affirmed the decisions regarding the expenditure on oil and gas fields, depreciation on assets, and the exclusion of profits from branches in Oman and Qatar.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2020 09:34:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1371 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292465</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the court found no fault in the Tribunal&#039;s decisions regarding the three questions of law raised by the revenue. The court noted that similar issues had been previously rejected, leading to the dismissal of the questions raised in the current appeal. The Tribunal&#039;s directions to the Assessing Officer were upheld, and the court affirmed the decisions regarding the expenditure on oil and gas fields, depreciation on assets, and the exclusion of profits from branches in Oman and Qatar.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>