<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (12) TMI 97 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292447</link>
    <description>Credit entries in favour of an assessee&#039;s minor children were treated as a transfer of assets under section 16(3)(a)(iv) because the business assets were described as self-acquired property and were never shown to have been clearly impressed with joint family character. A Hindu law partition presupposes joint family property and does not amount to an inter vivos transfer, but a division of separate property cannot be treated as a true partition unless prior blending or conversion into joint family property is established. On the materials, the entries to the wife, daughters and minor children did not prove a genuine partition of joint family assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 16:52:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (12) TMI 97 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292447</link>
      <description>Credit entries in favour of an assessee&#039;s minor children were treated as a transfer of assets under section 16(3)(a)(iv) because the business assets were described as self-acquired property and were never shown to have been clearly impressed with joint family character. A Hindu law partition presupposes joint family property and does not amount to an inter vivos transfer, but a division of separate property cannot be treated as a true partition unless prior blending or conversion into joint family property is established. On the materials, the entries to the wife, daughters and minor children did not prove a genuine partition of joint family assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>