https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402145 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the selection of respondent No.4 as the L-1 bidder, finding no flaw in Prasar Bharti's decision-making process. It held that respondent No.4's choice to absorb the tax component was permissible under the tender terms, rejecting the petitioner's argument that it disadvantaged their bid. The court emphasized limited judicial review in tender matters, citing precedent to support its decision. The petition was dismissed without costs, affirming the validity of respondent No.4's bid and the tender evaluation process. en-us Tue, 22 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Mar 2025 14:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402145 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the selection of respondent No.4 as the L-1 bidder, finding no flaw in Prasar Bharti's decision-making process. It held that respondent No.4's choice to absorb the tax component was permissible under the tender terms, rejecting the petitioner's argument that it disadvantaged their bid. The court emphasized limited judicial review in tender matters, citing precedent to support its decision. The petition was dismissed without costs, affirming the validity of respondent No.4's bid and the tender evaluation process. Case-Laws GST Tue, 22 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402145