https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402136 The court disposed of the petition by directing the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to expedite the pending appeal regarding the ownership and source of the 7kgs of gold seized from Respondent No.5. The court refrained from intervening under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, emphasizing that the CIT(A) should resolve the factual disputes within three months. No costs were awarded, and the order was to be digitally signed and shared with the parties. en-us Tue, 22 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402136 The court disposed of the petition by directing the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to expedite the pending appeal regarding the ownership and source of the 7kgs of gold seized from Respondent No.5. The court refrained from intervening under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, emphasizing that the CIT(A) should resolve the factual disputes within three months. No costs were awarded, and the order was to be digitally signed and shared with the parties. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 22 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402136