<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1617 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292434</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, declaring the reassessment invalid due to the assessing officer&#039;s failure to provide reasons recorded for re-opening before completing the assessment. The tribunal emphasized the significance of furnishing reasons to the assessee to enable them to challenge the assessment order properly. The reassessment was annulled solely based on the non-furnishing of reasons, without delving into the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 10:20:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1617 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292434</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, declaring the reassessment invalid due to the assessing officer&#039;s failure to provide reasons recorded for re-opening before completing the assessment. The tribunal emphasized the significance of furnishing reasons to the assessee to enable them to challenge the assessment order properly. The reassessment was annulled solely based on the non-furnishing of reasons, without delving into the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>