<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 744 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292441</link>
    <description>Existence of financial debt and default, supported by loan documents, account statements, debt acknowledgements, CIBIL material and balance-sheet records, justified admission of the section 7 insolvency petition. The corporate debtor did not meaningfully dispute the borrowing or liability, and the account was found irregular, non-performing and in default. Earlier settlement discussions and a one-time settlement arrangement did not bar admission because they were not complied with in full and the creditor was entitled to revoke them. The NCLT held that the debt was a financial debt and default was established on the record, so the petition was maintainable and admitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 10:20:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 744 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292441</link>
      <description>Existence of financial debt and default, supported by loan documents, account statements, debt acknowledgements, CIBIL material and balance-sheet records, justified admission of the section 7 insolvency petition. The corporate debtor did not meaningfully dispute the borrowing or liability, and the account was found irregular, non-performing and in default. Earlier settlement discussions and a one-time settlement arrangement did not bar admission because they were not complied with in full and the creditor was entitled to revoke them. The NCLT held that the debt was a financial debt and default was established on the record, so the petition was maintainable and admitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>