https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292433 In contempt proceedings, the court's inquiry is confined to whether the order alleged to have been disobeyed was complied with. It cannot re-open the correctness, validity, or propriety of that order, because doing so would amount to an impermissible exercise of review jurisdiction within contempt. A party aggrieved by the underlying direction must challenge it in appropriate appellate proceedings or seek relief from the issuing court. The impugned order was set aside because it wrongly tested the earlier direction instead of examining compliance, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 24 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Dec 2020 10:14:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292433 In contempt proceedings, the court's inquiry is confined to whether the order alleged to have been disobeyed was complied with. It cannot re-open the correctness, validity, or propriety of that order, because doing so would amount to an impermissible exercise of review jurisdiction within contempt. A party aggrieved by the underlying direction must challenge it in appropriate appellate proceedings or seek relief from the issuing court. The impugned order was set aside because it wrongly tested the earlier direction instead of examining compliance, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 24 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292433