<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 884 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402085</link>
    <description>Judicial review in tender matters under Article 226 is limited to checking whether the authority acted fairly, non-arbitrarily, and in line with the standards it fixed; the court will not substitute its own assessment of the bid decision. The bidder&#039;s challenge on alleged non-compliance with financial and documentary tender conditions failed because the required documents had been uploaded and minor objections did not invalidate acceptance of the technical bid. However, the field verification report raised a material issue about the legality of the proposed premises and the absence of sanctioned construction, requiring fresh consideration before a licence could be acted upon, with the existing licencee permitted to continue meanwhile.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 884 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402085</link>
      <description>Judicial review in tender matters under Article 226 is limited to checking whether the authority acted fairly, non-arbitrarily, and in line with the standards it fixed; the court will not substitute its own assessment of the bid decision. The bidder&#039;s challenge on alleged non-compliance with financial and documentary tender conditions failed because the required documents had been uploaded and minor objections did not invalidate acceptance of the technical bid. However, the field verification report raised a material issue about the legality of the proposed premises and the absence of sanctioned construction, requiring fresh consideration before a licence could be acted upon, with the existing licencee permitted to continue meanwhile.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>