<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 878 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402079</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, quashed the order rejecting the appeal, and restored the appeal for reconsideration with specific instructions for the petitioner to file an application for condonation of delay. The first respondent was directed to review the application in accordance with the applicable laws and provisions. The petitioner was required to appear before the first respondent on a specified date to fulfill the necessary procedural requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2020 15:08:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 878 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402079</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, quashed the order rejecting the appeal, and restored the appeal for reconsideration with specific instructions for the petitioner to file an application for condonation of delay. The first respondent was directed to review the application in accordance with the applicable laws and provisions. The petitioner was required to appear before the first respondent on a specified date to fulfill the necessary procedural requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>