<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 861 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402062</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by directing the Assessing Officer to consider 40% of the gross receipts as unaccounted income and to delete the addition of Rs. 2,54,000 made on account of unexplained capital contribution. Additionally, the Tribunal held that Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 could not be applied to unaccounted cash transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 21:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 861 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402062</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by directing the Assessing Officer to consider 40% of the gross receipts as unaccounted income and to delete the addition of Rs. 2,54,000 made on account of unexplained capital contribution. Additionally, the Tribunal held that Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 could not be applied to unaccounted cash transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>