https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402043 Restoration of a struck-off company under Section 252(3) was considered where the company asserted continued business activity, assets, and inadvertent non-filing of statutory returns and financial statements. The Registrar did not oppose restoration, and no pending investigation, inquiry, or complaint was shown. Taking a liberal view in the interest of justice, the Tribunal restored the company's name on the register, subject to compliance with pending statutory filings and payment of costs. Consequential restoration of the directors' DINs was also directed, allowing the company to revive its corporate status and resume operations. en-us Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Dec 2020 15:07:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402043 Restoration of a struck-off company under Section 252(3) was considered where the company asserted continued business activity, assets, and inadvertent non-filing of statutory returns and financial statements. The Registrar did not oppose restoration, and no pending investigation, inquiry, or complaint was shown. Taking a liberal view in the interest of justice, the Tribunal restored the company's name on the register, subject to compliance with pending statutory filings and payment of costs. Consequential restoration of the directors' DINs was also directed, allowing the company to revive its corporate status and resume operations. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402043