https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292426 The court upheld the validity of a mortgage on property claimed as the self-acquired property of the mortgagor's father. It was determined that a partition of self-acquired property between sons did not require a registered instrument under Hindu law. The court clarified that unequal distribution of self-acquired property by a father among sons was permissible without registration, distinguishing it from ancestral property. The appeal was dismissed, ruling that such transactions did not necessitate registration under the Transfer of Property Act, and no costs were awarded. en-us Thu, 17 Aug 1950 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Dec 2020 12:02:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292426 The court upheld the validity of a mortgage on property claimed as the self-acquired property of the mortgagor's father. It was determined that a partition of self-acquired property between sons did not require a registered instrument under Hindu law. The court clarified that unequal distribution of self-acquired property by a father among sons was permissible without registration, distinguishing it from ancestral property. The appeal was dismissed, ruling that such transactions did not necessitate registration under the Transfer of Property Act, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Aug 1950 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292426