https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292423 A defective verification of a plaint under Order 6 Rule 15(2) CPC was treated as a curable irregularity, and amendment related back to the original filing date, so limitation was not defeated. On liability under a promissory note, a karta who executed the note in his own name bound only himself as the signatory; the other coparceners were not parties to the instrument and could not be made liable on the note merely because the borrowing was for family purposes. Liability against the joint family, if any, had to be pursued as an underlying family debt in a properly framed claim. Recovery was therefore confined to the signatory's estate. en-us Fri, 21 Jan 1927 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Dec 2020 11:18:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292423 A defective verification of a plaint under Order 6 Rule 15(2) CPC was treated as a curable irregularity, and amendment related back to the original filing date, so limitation was not defeated. On liability under a promissory note, a karta who executed the note in his own name bound only himself as the signatory; the other coparceners were not parties to the instrument and could not be made liable on the note merely because the borrowing was for family purposes. Liability against the joint family, if any, had to be pursued as an underlying family debt in a properly framed claim. Recovery was therefore confined to the signatory's estate. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Jan 1927 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292423