https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292410 The tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal, ruling that the objection to the jurisdiction of ITO, Ward II(3), Jalandhar, was untimely under section 124(3). It found the notice under section 143(2) issued on 15.09.2010 valid, granting jurisdiction to frame the assessment under section 143(3). The tribunal held that the objection lacked merit both factually and legally, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and rendering the stay application moot. en-us Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Dec 2020 20:13:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292410 The tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal, ruling that the objection to the jurisdiction of ITO, Ward II(3), Jalandhar, was untimely under section 124(3). It found the notice under section 143(2) issued on 15.09.2010 valid, granting jurisdiction to frame the assessment under section 143(3). The tribunal held that the objection lacked merit both factually and legally, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and rendering the stay application moot. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292410