<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1836 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292417</link>
    <description>A proposed scheme of amalgamation was sanctioned after the Registrar of Companies raised no objection and the Income Tax Department did not respond within the stipulated time. The Court treated the absence of any objection from the Central Government disclosure and the tax department&#039;s silence as supporting approval of the scheme, and orders were made in terms of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 20:13:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1836 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292417</link>
      <description>A proposed scheme of amalgamation was sanctioned after the Registrar of Companies raised no objection and the Income Tax Department did not respond within the stipulated time. The Court treated the absence of any objection from the Central Government disclosure and the tax department&#039;s silence as supporting approval of the scheme, and orders were made in terms of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>