<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1942 (2) TMI 30 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292407</link>
    <description>Where the High Court agrees with the revenue authority&#039;s reasoning on the referred questions, the reference is answered in the affirmative. The Court examined the Commissioner&#039;s submissions and the statement of case, found the Commissioner&#039;s view correct on all three referred questions, and upheld the revenue&#039;s position. The stated ratio is that agreement with the revenue authority&#039;s reasoning leads to affirmative answers on the referred questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 1942 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 17:22:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1942 (2) TMI 30 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292407</link>
      <description>Where the High Court agrees with the revenue authority&#039;s reasoning on the referred questions, the reference is answered in the affirmative. The Court examined the Commissioner&#039;s submissions and the statement of case, found the Commissioner&#039;s view correct on all three referred questions, and upheld the revenue&#039;s position. The stated ratio is that agreement with the revenue authority&#039;s reasoning leads to affirmative answers on the referred questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 1942 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>