<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 821 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402022</link>
    <description>A valid and timely notice under section 143(2) by the jurisdictionally correct Assessing Officer was treated as a jurisdictional prerequisite for scrutiny assessment. Because that notice was issued beyond the permissible time, the Tribunal held that the assessment was without jurisdiction and could not survive, so the assessment was quashed as void ab initio. Once the assessment failed on this threshold defect, the additions on merits were not examined and were left academic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 10:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 821 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402022</link>
      <description>A valid and timely notice under section 143(2) by the jurisdictionally correct Assessing Officer was treated as a jurisdictional prerequisite for scrutiny assessment. Because that notice was issued beyond the permissible time, the Tribunal held that the assessment was without jurisdiction and could not survive, so the assessment was quashed as void ab initio. Once the assessment failed on this threshold defect, the additions on merits were not examined and were left academic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>