<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1946 (12) TMI 4 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292405</link>
    <description>Delayed production of witness statements recorded during investigation under Section 162 CrPC did not vitiate the trial where no failure of justice or prejudice was shown; the lapse was treated as a curable irregularity under Section 537 CrPC. Under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, only so much of an accused&#039;s information in police custody as distinctly relates to the fact discovered is admissible. The disclosure exception does not extend to the whole confession or to statements about past use of the object or the offence itself, so only discovery-related words could be proved and the remaining portions were inadmissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 09:52:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1946 (12) TMI 4 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292405</link>
      <description>Delayed production of witness statements recorded during investigation under Section 162 CrPC did not vitiate the trial where no failure of justice or prejudice was shown; the lapse was treated as a curable irregularity under Section 537 CrPC. Under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, only so much of an accused&#039;s information in police custody as distinctly relates to the fact discovered is admissible. The disclosure exception does not extend to the whole confession or to statements about past use of the object or the offence itself, so only discovery-related words could be proved and the remaining portions were inadmissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>