<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (10) TMI 12 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24090</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitions, ruling that gold ornaments could not be included as jewellery in the calculation of net wealth for the assessment years in question. The judgment emphasized that prior to April 1, 1972, gold ornaments were not considered jewellery for wealth tax purposes, and the relevant amendment including gold ornaments within the definition of jewellery was effective only from April 1, 1972. The court concluded that the legislative intent and timeline of amendments supported this interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 16:01:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (10) TMI 12 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24090</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitions, ruling that gold ornaments could not be included as jewellery in the calculation of net wealth for the assessment years in question. The judgment emphasized that prior to April 1, 1972, gold ornaments were not considered jewellery for wealth tax purposes, and the relevant amendment including gold ornaments within the definition of jewellery was effective only from April 1, 1972. The court concluded that the legislative intent and timeline of amendments supported this interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>