<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1192 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292402</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s allowance of a deduction under s.36(1)(vii) read with s.36(2) for a debt of Rs. 19,24,09,280 written off as bad in the assessee&#039;s return for AY 2001-02. The court held the statutory conditions were satisfied when the debt was written off as bad and irrecoverable and that subsequent recovery attempts or ongoing legal proceedings did not negate the claim. The deduction therefore stood allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 17:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1192 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292402</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s allowance of a deduction under s.36(1)(vii) read with s.36(2) for a debt of Rs. 19,24,09,280 written off as bad in the assessee&#039;s return for AY 2001-02. The court held the statutory conditions were satisfied when the debt was written off as bad and irrecoverable and that subsequent recovery attempts or ongoing legal proceedings did not negate the claim. The deduction therefore stood allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>