https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292385 A plaint for permanent injunction does not become a suit for declaration of title merely because title may incidentally be examined while deciding the injunction claim. The High Court held that the decisive relief remained injunction, so the plaint did not require amendment or revaluation under the proviso to Section 7(4)(c) of the Court Fees Act, 1870. The preliminary objection to revision under Section 115 CPC also failed, because the jurisdictional question arose from the proposed amendment and valuation direction itself. The order directing amendment and revaluation was set aside, and the suit was ordered to proceed as originally filed. en-us Fri, 08 Nov 1935 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292385 A plaint for permanent injunction does not become a suit for declaration of title merely because title may incidentally be examined while deciding the injunction claim. The High Court held that the decisive relief remained injunction, so the plaint did not require amendment or revaluation under the proviso to Section 7(4)(c) of the Court Fees Act, 1870. The preliminary objection to revision under Section 115 CPC also failed, because the jurisdictional question arose from the proposed amendment and valuation direction itself. The order directing amendment and revaluation was set aside, and the suit was ordered to proceed as originally filed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Nov 1935 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292385