<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1913 (5) TMI 3 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292384</link>
    <description>The Privy Council found overwhelming evidence of the plaintiffs&#039; acceptance of the partition in a family dispute over joint family properties. The document, termed a &quot;will,&quot; was actually a family arrangement for immediate partition, binding all parties. The judgment affirmed the lower court&#039;s decision on village property but ruled differently on two buildings, stating the document did not effect an absolute transfer. The High Court&#039;s decision favoring the plaintiffs was reversed, restoring the Subordinate Judge&#039;s decree. Plaintiffs were directed to pay defendants&#039; appeal costs, with defendants bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 1913 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 17:24:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1913 (5) TMI 3 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292384</link>
      <description>The Privy Council found overwhelming evidence of the plaintiffs&#039; acceptance of the partition in a family dispute over joint family properties. The document, termed a &quot;will,&quot; was actually a family arrangement for immediate partition, binding all parties. The judgment affirmed the lower court&#039;s decision on village property but ruled differently on two buildings, stating the document did not effect an absolute transfer. The High Court&#039;s decision favoring the plaintiffs was reversed, restoring the Subordinate Judge&#039;s decree. Plaintiffs were directed to pay defendants&#039; appeal costs, with defendants bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 1913 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>