<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Goods Seizure u/s 130 Deemed Illegal; No Intent to Evade Tax Found, Confiscation Conditions Not Met.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55984</link>
    <description>Seizure and detention of goods - Confiscation of goods - Section 130 of the Act - It has not been established that there was any contravention of any provision or any Rules with an &quot;intent to evade payment of tax&quot; - none of the ingredients which are required for confiscation existed in the present case and thus, the confiscation itself was wholly arbitrary and illegal. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:08:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:08:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Goods Seizure u/s 130 Deemed Illegal; No Intent to Evade Tax Found, Confiscation Conditions Not Met.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55984</link>
      <description>Seizure and detention of goods - Confiscation of goods - Section 130 of the Act - It has not been established that there was any contravention of any provision or any Rules with an &quot;intent to evade payment of tax&quot; - none of the ingredients which are required for confiscation existed in the present case and thus, the confiscation itself was wholly arbitrary and illegal. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:08:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>