https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401988 The Court quashed the orders confirming the rejection of the petitioner's refund application under the CGST Rules, 2017, as the petitioner was not afforded a hearing as mandated by Rule 92(3). The matter was remanded to the second respondent for reconsideration, with directions to provide a fair hearing to the petitioner and make a final decision within twelve weeks. The Court disposed of the writ petition without costs. en-us Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:01:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401988 The Court quashed the orders confirming the rejection of the petitioner's refund application under the CGST Rules, 2017, as the petitioner was not afforded a hearing as mandated by Rule 92(3). The matter was remanded to the second respondent for reconsideration, with directions to provide a fair hearing to the petitioner and make a final decision within twelve weeks. The Court disposed of the writ petition without costs. Case-Laws GST Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401988