<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 784 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401985</link>
    <description>Section 44(6) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 fastens a director&#039;s liability only in relation to recovery from a private company and operates subject to the Companies Act, 2013. Because the company concerned was a public limited company, the statutory basis for proceeding against a non-executive director did not survive. Recovery measures, including the prohibitory order, demand notice and attachment, were therefore without legal sanction and could not be sustained against the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 784 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401985</link>
      <description>Section 44(6) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 fastens a director&#039;s liability only in relation to recovery from a private company and operates subject to the Companies Act, 2013. Because the company concerned was a public limited company, the statutory basis for proceeding against a non-executive director did not survive. Recovery measures, including the prohibitory order, demand notice and attachment, were therefore without legal sanction and could not be sustained against the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>