<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 783 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401984</link>
    <description>The appeal concerned the Tribunal&#039;s failure to adjudicate the admissibility of additional evidence under Rule 29 of the ITAT Rules. The Delhi HC admitted the appeal on that question, directed that the Tribunal record be summoned, and listed the matter for further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 12:53:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 783 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401984</link>
      <description>The appeal concerned the Tribunal&#039;s failure to adjudicate the admissibility of additional evidence under Rule 29 of the ITAT Rules. The Delhi HC admitted the appeal on that question, directed that the Tribunal record be summoned, and listed the matter for further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>