<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 770 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401971</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the Ld.CIT(A) in a case involving disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) read with Section 194J. The Tribunal ruled that the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) do not apply to cases of short deduction of TDS. Consequently, disallowances for &#039;Carriage Fees/Channel Placement fees&#039;, &#039;editing expenses&#039;, and commission payments were deleted. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Ld.CIT(A)&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2020 22:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 770 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401971</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the Ld.CIT(A) in a case involving disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) read with Section 194J. The Tribunal ruled that the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) do not apply to cases of short deduction of TDS. Consequently, disallowances for &#039;Carriage Fees/Channel Placement fees&#039;, &#039;editing expenses&#039;, and commission payments were deleted. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Ld.CIT(A)&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>