https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401965 A registered release deed that clearly evinced an intention to transfer property was treated as valid title-conveying evidence within a fiduciary setting, so the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 did not defeat the plaintiffs' claim on the facts found. The appellate court's additional issue on benami transaction was unsupported by the pleadings and evidence, because the deed's execution and recitals were not genuinely in dispute and the contrary inference was unsustainable. The High Court held the adverse finding on the deed and title to be perverse, restored the trial court's decree declaring title and possession, and maintained the injunction. en-us Wed, 15 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jan 2021 16:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401965 A registered release deed that clearly evinced an intention to transfer property was treated as valid title-conveying evidence within a fiduciary setting, so the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 did not defeat the plaintiffs' claim on the facts found. The appellate court's additional issue on benami transaction was unsupported by the pleadings and evidence, because the deed's execution and recitals were not genuinely in dispute and the contrary inference was unsustainable. The High Court held the adverse finding on the deed and title to be perverse, restored the trial court's decree declaring title and possession, and maintained the injunction. Case-Laws Benami Property Wed, 15 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401965